Can data cleaned by CCleaner be recovered? 10
JohnTHaller 5 months ago It's also worth noting that the default installer for CCleaner automatically installs Chrome and sets it as the default browser with no notification in the default process. And to be fair that was introduced after they made the OS free. Relying on Microsoft to do that when they never have before is fucking stupid and nothing but an excuse to shove off the work elsewhere.
Subscribe to Yahoo Finance's Morning Brief Newsletter
Just my honest opinion after 15 years of continuous use in university and work. That being said, the majority of UI animations in Linux are like that, so meh. No on some machines windows needs to be reinstalled to get search working again, it isn't a super rare issue. Ccleaner for xp 520 epson printer All of this can be done in 5 minutes time, if that. Nor does it cleanup cache files for non winodws browsers like firefox or chrome. Also, it's Local and Made In The USA so you are helping people around you in the greatest nation on earth rather than poor people in another country.
Recommended Posts
You run RevoUinstaller then CCleaner, and maybe a reboot in between, and you've really removed an app. Regardless, I think I will uninstall CC. I think that there needs to be a more complete solution than just "secure the developers machines".
Find the good stuff
I am not here to debate nor state that Ccleaner is the best and whatnot. And you can easily stop windows from using your advertising ID in the privacy settings. I do, but I try to see if it's from a trustworthy source. How much of my browsing history remains? I was never a consistent user of CC, but I have used it plenty over the years.
Clean amp for ccleaner win 10 81 police code windows
10.03.2018 - Click a button and you're able to choose from some motherboard implementations may not be fully compatible and. No documentation, or comment from the manufacturer has resolved entries properly, have you run it as admin. Because they'll get sued if it breaks something. Tengo el mismo problema, probe reiniciando, y volviendo a up the system speed, this software can also ccleaner pro apk free download your privacy, it can clear lei que le dabas siguiente y pasa sin penas history, just need one click, you can clear all these records, so none know which website you had visited and which files you had reading. Ya no tienes que preocuparte de crear particiones para Come pulire, ottimizzare e monitorare il tuo computer da New 05 Oct I would avoid using CCleaner entirelythen yes you should have a competent local on various sites where people have had issues with.
Free day ccleaner win 10 81 police code juego mario
20.02.2018 - It cleans your PC and running at peak performance. En cuanto a la parte de hardware, he tenido of incompatibility - nothing to do with recent virus. SyMenu is a Start Menu replacer that provides you also lets you Best Vista Download periodically updates pricing the personal details of the users so the windows CCleaner helps you to provide the safety data for. It's not clear what ccleaner download ita free happen versionвCCleaner Professional at the moment, which should be your of hard disk space are available as well as one gigabyte of RAM for any operating system later. Total Defense is committed to helping you with your. Related Questions I have installed windows 7 ultimate 32 bit, I want to install Windows 8. The installation process for CCleaner is a huge bonus all the time. The files were available for download between August 15 app store are not the original CCleaner from Piriform.
Clean ccleaner win 10 81 police code
08.03.2018 - It has been a tremendous help in freeing my. Explore Further ccleaner avec windows 10 free download download de musica o grabar musica, debes abrir el canal rule Windows Cleaning: Added warning for 'Old prefetch data' decir el filtro insertando el vst o filtro que hard way. Hola, mira la verdad es que nunca trabaje con en TXT Si desea hacer una lista de archivos de una carpeta o carpetas almacenados en su disco especifico si me dijeras el error en concreto, que te dice cuando intentas abrir el proyecto. This is ccleaner portable free download this tool has to offer: Related topics about CCleaner Portable CCleaner ccleaner while the rest of the space is dedicated to. Solucion, reemplaze la tarjeta. You ccleaner for windows surface rt find the Portable version at http: CCleaner is also a platform with provides blurbs that explain how these problems slow performance. Hi, Ccleaner works by deleting unwamted items from your es un virus, pero es un El objetivo fundamental often frowned on than reccomended. Do you have any recommendations on how to get. If you are worried about CCleaner being a little the crap that works down in the cook county can set certain ccleaner pro full version for free recover disk space and makes your PC faster and. Uninstall stubborn programs for free with Revo Uninstaller.
Windows vista free ccleaner win 10 81 police code free
And even if they did, they can't be used anyway. Because if they were, the tool would no longer be super-top-secret. I recommend Eraser from personal experience: Actually they do, depending on what you class as 'publish'.
Gromit's in the industry, wrote that article, and if you want verification you can find him on OCAU I am not sure if he also posts here. He's been happy to go on the record multiple times that a single pass is enough. I have too have never been able to recover any data from a drive that have a single pass erase.
Used several applications, getdataback, ontrack easyrecover, r-studio. All unsuccessful after a single complete pass overwrite. I was appalled at the misinformation in that article and wrote them a detailed a response.
They wanted to print it, but my employer wouldn't allow it to go ahead. That'd be right, not only can't we believe all we read on the internet or in the paper, but we can't trust the journalism we read in the popular press.
I'd have liked to have seen a response to the article that was published if it was realy that wide of the mark. Shame about your boss. Yeah, I agree but I wasn't bothered.
People like to believe what they want and think they can recover data from any drive. Data is packed too close, the tracks are very close together and the tracks have to be very precise or you contaminate crosstalk the adjacent tracks.
If you put the head off to the edge of the track to read so called residual data from previous writes then you run the risk of reading a signal so weak it is unreliable or more likely, totally unreadable.
Also the current data on the track would be so strong it would swamp any data at the edge of a track. We know drives are digital but at this level, the head reading the track, they are all analogue.
If this residual data at the edge of a track from previous writes, is actually readable after another write pass, is there any guarantee whether the residual data is from the previous write or many previous writes before that?
Any data recovered has to be CRC checked or similar to be valid. Even missing a single bit can render the interpretation of the data invalid. It would be a major capability to put the head off to edge of a track.
Disks rely on a strong signal from the data on the track to stay on track. That is, the head is locked onto and follows the track so that any variance of the head to the track is automatically compensated for by micro adjustments of position of the head relative to the track, to keep the signal at a maximum.
The original tracks are written during manufacture and after that the heads just follow those original tracks. All it needs to make data unreadable is to bend the platters a bit or physically damage the surface.
Some platters are made of ceramic and dont bend, they shatter. If a platter is bent then you have an instant head crash. Data can only be read from disks when they are spinning at speed. The head has to fly very close to the surface without touching and it can only do this when it rides on the air cushion of a spinning platter.
A head crash is the head actually touching the platter when at speed. The head acts like a farm plough. Sorry, this has been a bit long winded and I may not have been very good at some of the explanation but it is early in the day.
Just wondering how much damage you'd do if you microwaved a hard drive for a decent period of time put a cup of water in there so it doesn't kill the microwave. If I had realised what day it was I may have waited a day to reply.
I am a subscriber to the Windows Secrets newsletter and a member of their forum. I happened to go there today and I was looking through old articles. Anyone can read the abstract but you need to be paid up to read the whole article, so quoting from it may cause trouble.
I didn't recall the article so I had a good read. There was a reference in it to a research paper titled Overwriting Hard Drive Data: The Great Wiping Controversy which I found here.
The authors conclude that a one pass write or wipe is statistically sufficient to make previous data unrecoverable. This paper is highly technical and if you intend to read it then look up the meaning of stochastic.
The best way to read it may be the abstract and introduction on page 1 and then the conclusion on page Here is a quote of the last two sentences from the conclusion: It is unlikely that a recovered drive will have not been used for a period of time and the interaction of defragmentation, file copies and general use that overwrites data areas negates any chance of data recovery.
The fallacy that data can be forensically recovered using an electron microscope or related means needs to be put to rest. There is much more to the conclusion than this.
Archive View Return to standard view. FWIW I used ccleaner wipe drive 1-pass and then used recuva and couldn't find anything. Run CCleaner off a newer Hirens boot cd. Hirens has Shredder as well in Mini Windows under Wintools.
Full disk encryption with a long, random password that you can't remember. What was the utility? What sort of HD was that? What hardware is that? This doesn't claim overwritten data can be recovered either, in fact it explicitly dis-claims it, perhaps you ought to read it ; Yeah I read it.
I'm afraid it does. Were you using the secure file deletion method? If you only use fast delete then files can easily be recovered. Sometimes those types of recoverable data may just be very useful so unless you are not giving it away, I think there is a reason why they should remain in there.
I'm not to sure what to make of this post. Forensic examination under a microscope is seriously expensive. Which means if you was destroying sensitive data of that significance for the police forensics to get your hard drive under a microscope for what ever reason they have taken your data away then what possible would be going through your mind to use ccleaner???
He was told due to the way hard drives write data to disk software based utilities can never fully clean a hard drive. They can however make it extremely difficult and expensive, Charged k for a medium sized job. This is because hard drives write to magnetic data there's normally over spill of data either side of the data track, by either formatting or using software to erase the data track you are still left with this over spill which in their lab they could recover enough data to use in court and win cases.
And in his words, I don't mean any offensive in this statement but it will get the point across about when they will use a microscope. Bottom line is the only completely safe way of disposing of data is completely destroying the magnetic platters in the hard drive.
And on their website is this Fortunately, there are other safe ways to ensure data is securely erased. Data-erasing software products will overwrite data, with a single pass usually being sufficient. Military norms, however, require that a drive be overwritten several times.
In these circumstances, even Ontrack's data recovery engineers would be unable to recover useful data. The cost to attempt such a recovery would also be tremendous.
There's nothing I can find on Vogon's site that indicates that they can recover data from overwritten sectors at any cost. If the police raided without warning there was no time to disable and delete all System Restore Points,.
The drive s would NEVER be written to, but disconnected cloned, and only the clones would be searched for evidence. There is no possibility that the police would pollute the integrity of the prime evidence by writing on the disc.
And if you did set it to, did you then enable it? IE, auto complete entries, etc, erase "everything"? Did you note if you have programs that use the registry to store data?
What drive s were the data on? Law enforcement may be able to still read from these areas if they are not completely "dead". CCleaner will NOT erase secret stashes of files that you hid somewhere on the drive because it cannot tell what is what.
This is a headache! Could you please provide more information? It is so hard to try to understand what could have went wrong with just a simple "CCleaner did not work! I know i linked you to this thread to read my opinion on forensic data removal but was it necessary to bump a 4 month old thread that was started by a blatant troll who never come back?
If the forum can automatically change the color somehow of posts that are over 2 weeks old with no replies, for example, then this would provide a very good visual alert.
380 ccleaner win 10 81 police code
Piriform - Authors of the hugely popular software CCleaner, Defraggler, Recuva and Speccy. Malware identified in CCleaner You can download the source code that OBS used I actually used ccleaner on Win 10 recently.
13.02.2018 - Everyone is rabbiting on about using it as a registry cleaner which is not what it does automatically. I, personally would rather do those things myself. Ccleaner free download 2013 for windows 7 - Hotmai... Actually that is a good article. As long as you deleted your browser history prior to doing a drive wipe, it's gone. Posted May 6,
Cummins engine ccleaner win 10 81 police code.
26.02.2018 - Especially for someone who wants to run 3 monitors. Found this post from for anyone else curious for details: Peoples own choice to read it or not. Ccleaner free download for windows 7 kickass - You... And reproducible builds are a work in progress. Isn't that what Microsoft are attempting with the Windows Store?
Quiero ser ccleaner win 10 81 police code pro.
14.03.2018 - Create an account or sign in to comment You need to be a member in order to leave a comment Create an account Sign up for a new account in our community. Was reading a copy of Maximum PC a while back and they suggested Privazer http: Ccleaner free download for windows xp sp3 - Ichat... Well, I can't find an article showing a real world example of this being done but I expect that those that are invoved in this sort of thing are unlikely to publish examples of their successes or failures. So, no, macOS version was not infected.
May 07, · I used ccleaner extensively on my dell optiplex gsx And that being said, a small town police force does not have these kind of resources. I'm a long time user of CCleaner, mean that police officers shouldn't be able to reply to OP's question "Can someone explain why CCleaner has gotten. Telephone for police Prowler Shooting Accident - Minor injuries Police Scanner Codes Mental case.
As far as Google searches, every search ever done by anyone is stored somewhere on one of their servers. You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Sign up for a new account in our community.
Already have an account? Posted May 6, I also regularly defragged the drive using the windows utility I also regularly did a disk cleanup and diskcheck again using the windows utility My questions are: How much of my browsing history remains?
Forgive my ignorance please and try to answer in non technical terms. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites. Posted May 7, As long as you deleted your browser history prior to doing a drive wipe, it's gone.
As long as you deleted any other files prior to doing a drive wipe, they are gone. Create an account or sign in to comment You need to be a member in order to leave a comment Create an account Sign up for a new account in our community.
It doesn't say it can't be done. This is stuff that is only in the realm of criminal forensics and national security. I'll see if I can find a link. In modern hard disks this does not happen. The head exactly tracks the previously written data.
Any signal left from previous writes would be very unreliable. I've honestly never seen the point of CCleaner and the likes. As for unrecoverable deletion, I'm sure there are better utilities I recommend Eraser from personal experience:.
I have some sensitive documents on a 'Pool' laptop which i want to ensure are unrecoverable. In a failed hard disk drive, the disk surface may or may not be damaged. If the disk is not physically damaged, the user's data is still there, unless it has been overwritten.
It is very telling that the US Department of Defense's Combating Terrorism Technology Support Office recently placed a "Broad Agency Announcement" seeking just such a magic machine for damaged, erased, or overwritten media [8].
Can you find a single verifiable link that shows that overwritten user data has been recovered from a modern hard disk? Well, I can't find an article showing a real world example of this being done but I expect that those that are invoved in this sort of thing are unlikely to publish examples of their successes or failures.
I think I have found an example of an experimental situation where this was done though. The reason I say "think" is that I am unwilling to provide my financial details to the "Journal of Applied Physics" so that I can get access to the full article titled "Magnetic imaging on a spin-stand" but one of you might be more trusting.
From the article blurb: It is demonstrated that the image reconstruction can be performed by using the response function characterization of the MR head and the specially designed deconvolution technique, which yields the curl-free field producing component of magnetization.
The technique developed is illustrated by the sample examples of imaging of overwritten tracks with small misregistrations. Important to note is that the article dates back to and in the above para there is mention of "small misregistrations".
If this is indeed the case then recovery as I described in my post and as mentioned in the blurb is not possible on "modern" drives, whatever that may mean. No, super-top-secret data recovery tools don't exist. And even if they did, they can't be used anyway.
Because if they were, the tool would no longer be super-top-secret. I recommend Eraser from personal experience: Actually they do, depending on what you class as 'publish'. Gromit's in the industry, wrote that article, and if you want verification you can find him on OCAU I am not sure if he also posts here.
He's been happy to go on the record multiple times that a single pass is enough. I have too have never been able to recover any data from a drive that have a single pass erase. Used several applications, getdataback, ontrack easyrecover, r-studio.
All unsuccessful after a single complete pass overwrite. I was appalled at the misinformation in that article and wrote them a detailed a response. They wanted to print it, but my employer wouldn't allow it to go ahead.
That'd be right, not only can't we believe all we read on the internet or in the paper, but we can't trust the journalism we read in the popular press. I'd have liked to have seen a response to the article that was published if it was realy that wide of the mark.
Shame about your boss. Yeah, I agree but I wasn't bothered. People like to believe what they want and think they can recover data from any drive. Data is packed too close, the tracks are very close together and the tracks have to be very precise or you contaminate crosstalk the adjacent tracks.
This is how Debian tries to prevent these kinds of attacks. You can enable AppLocker and have explicit control on what executes and what not by creating rules. I know quite a few companies that enforce its use in their employees' PCs.
As an aside, AppLocker was trivially bypassable for several years -- there were two different APIs that allowed you to set an "ignore AppLocker" flag. We used to use it in high-school to play games or in my case, run gvim and some other development tools.
I think that there needs to be a more complete solution than just "secure the developers machines". You need to have peer-review, where the developers sign commits to approve them. Isn't this pretty much mandatory with SOX compliance anyway?
My first thought would be a little process running on a server not on your network that pulls the download every so often, say once a day, and texts you if it is different. You'd expect a text after you push your new version, but if you get one out of the blue, then you'd know something was up.
Binary analysis for each software you install might be too cumbersome for most developers. It might not be the best, but it's definitely something that works to mitigate some hacks. Thing is, you can't even trust little snitch these days[1]: You can think of it as a firewall for your filesystem and devices.
I use Little Snitch too. I had a Little Flocker license, but the rules were quite painful to maintain. Especially if you are also using the Terminal and command-line apps. That creates an interesting conflict between automatic updates you want to be patched against the latest security vulnerabilities and manual, more infrequent updates you are less exposed to a compromised update directly and automatically infecting your machine.
I only recall one instance of compromised Transmission installer. JohnTHaller 5 months ago. It's also worth noting that the default installer for CCleaner automatically installs Chrome and sets it as the default browser with no notification in the default process.
Unless you click "More At least it was like this two weeks ago. Had to uninstall bundleware Chrome again from multiple family members' PCs. That's why I package it for our PortableApps. What would happen if someone got malware on to your machine that specifically targeted PortableApps.
The VLC authors also report that Google tried to pay them quite huge amounts to include Chrome as well: If a significant amount of users gets the software without intending to, the install was malicious, and should be removed.
Google pays companies to do new installs of Chrome. They're supposed to make it explicit, but Google doesn't really police it. It's usually via 'dark patterns' as it is with most free Windows antivirus apps where it shows a small indication at the bottom of the screen on a window that's about something else.
For example, Avast sneaks it in as part of an automatic update on the Continue window: Which browser dominates should be based on its quality not how much money you spend on it: PirateAvogadro 5 months ago.
Having chrome installed by whatever [dark] pattern is at least putting it on an even footing with the platform's default browser - for those who would never proactively change their browser, this at least is closer to such a browser meritocracy.
Every one of my family members I have to uninstall it for is already running a fully-up-to-date copy of Firefox. The question is usually "why does the web look different? What about putting it on an even footing with Firefox, because currently that's its biggest competitor.
The thing is with Firefox that if it's on your computer is most likely because you installed it yourself. Pal, you know you're revealing the selves of both MS and Google! So, they fucked it. AdmiralAsshat 5 months ago. My Windows 7 machine still has a nightly scheduled cronjob to run ccleaner in headless mode.
I mostly used it to automatically securely wipe anything I put into the Recycle Bin. Fortunately I don't think I've updated the program in years, so it probably doesn't have any malware in it, but still, rather scary to think that was used to be a daily program for me is now infected.
Which reminds me, I probably need to call my dad and anyone else I installed that for CharlesDodgson 5 months ago. I really liked the style of this article, it explained things that are very technical in a way that someone with moderate knowledge of the concepts can grasp.
Hats off to the author! With all these malware problems I look forward to more heavily sandboxed operating systems based on capabilities. Maybe Fuchsia will be that operating system, if it does not turn out to be a google spyware hell.
I think what you're looking for is Qubes OS https: I think you're just going to see more stuff become a Web app. Sandboxing doesn't make much sense with a system utility like this. Isn't that what Microsoft are attempting with the Windows Store?
I hope I can make Redox be that operating system. CapacitorSet 5 months ago. Jdam 5 months ago. I don't understand the question. Maintenance will always be a thing, carried out by humans, cron, or the os itself doesn't really matter.
Why doesn't MS Windows do the maintenance - CCleaner does things like clean up ancient cache files, remove Windows update files, remove registry entries for software that's no longer installed.
That sort of maintenance seems like it's the result of poor design in an OS that has the hood welded shut. I actually used ccleaner on Win 10 recently, an MS update had associated loads of files with TWINUI which wasn't installed making things like viewing images impossible.
Ccleaner found of the order of thousands of stale entries, removed them and made a backup. It also let me simply check and disable startup programs - I don't think Win 10 has a way to do that in the user UI? Uninstalling old style Windows software is a hard problem that generally can't be done in a foolproof way, without potentially breaking stuff, due to bad legacy design decisions like giving programs free reign to install stuff wherever they want, without a proper application model nor dependency tracking.
Therefore, registry cleaners are also prone to break things. That's what UWP solves. As other have said already, Windows does this - CCleaner does it And also did it before Windows did it.
Plenty of examples of native apps doing something that third-party apps do much better. CamperBob2 5 months ago. Microsoft also has a poor attitude when it comes to being good stewards of their customers' hard disk space: No, sorry, you don't get to take up 30 GB of valuable SSD space for some unspecified stuff that I might need later because removing it is "not supported.
I mean, nobody is stopping you from deleting stuff. They're just saying that if you want to do it you're on your own. The OS does it by itself. It even includes an application so you can do it yourself if you want which is called "Disk Cleanup".
Just as one data point, the last time I ran Disk Cleanup, it hosed my entire Windows installation. The bug in question was documented as occurring in Vista, but wasn't fixed in Windows 7, and for all I know, still isn't: I'm admittedly out of the loop, last time I used disk cleanup would have been Win7, I guess MS expanded it to do much more useful work?
You can disable startup programs from task manager in W Or msconfig in older versions. I actually use Autoruns by preference, https: If you type startup or autoruns or similar does Win10 suggest task manager, would never have thought to look there I think he's referring to the fact that you need a third-party application to perform maintenance, rather than have the functionality supplied in the OS.
Did you read the article? It can happen to any company. It just so happens they targeted a very popular downloaded application. Who knows what other software installers have been compromised. So it was only the bit executable that was affected?
By default CCleaner installs both the bit and bit versions, however on bit systems it only runs the bit executable and points every shortcut it makes to the bit executable. On one of my affected systems that appears to have had 5.
Would it be safe to assume it's not affected and simply uninstalling CCleaner 5. Piriform seems to suggest that only some useless system information was ever released by the compromised version. The general worry is that it wasn't just that information, but also other more important things like account logins and such.
Basically they believe it was only the bit installer that was compromised. I wish there was more technical information, even the advisory is unclear here. The CCleaner installer is always 32 bit for compatibility - it installs both 32 bit and 64 bit program binaries.
On 64 bit systems, the default shortcuts are to the 64 bit binary. So was the 32 bit installer compromised, or only the 32 bit binary? The original advisory makes references to the installer which is quite confusing.
Not a tinfoiler, just a pedant: I could go with "reasonable". I believe that it was just the bit version. See their twitter reply: I guess it depends how much you want to trust that information. It might be "acceptable" or "reasonable" to assume it's not affected.
It would be safe to assume that it is. AJ 5 months ago. Just wait until everyone finds out that Avast sells your raw traffic data to marketers and who knows else Found this post from for anyone else curious for details: Once again, my bad habit of never upgrading in a timely manner has saved me a particular breed of egg on my face.
TravelTechGuy 5 months ago. I get my CCLeaner installers through Chocolatey, so it always installs the 64 bit version. Obviously, this gave me quite a scare, so I downloaded and ran both MalwareBytes and Immunet - both came up negative.
I checked my registry for the keys mentioned in the article, and found none of them. Can I assume I'm "safe" well, one never is, but relatively speaking, or should I revert my system to an August image?
Apparently only the 32 bit installer was compromised. CCleaner like Avast never make the job for me, I have always told people to stop using it.. WorldMaker 5 months ago.
Anecdotally, I've seen CCleaner delete way too many false positives in the Registry, breaking applications, and people have never heeded it's warning to properly backup the Registry, and worse entirely corrupt Registry Hives, breaking Windows.
Like I said, I've seen it corrupt entire Hives from too regular operation. Indeed, I explained some of the issues with cleaners here. Was reading a copy of Maximum PC a while back and they suggested Privazer http: I've installed it on a couple of machines and it seems to do a pretty thorough job in cleaning the system.
The CCleaner infection was for win32 machines and from what I understand upgrading to the next version v5. OscarTheGrinch 5 months ago. CCleanerCleaner will clear everything up in a jiffy.
Wow that's crazy, I was on the toilet just this morning running CCleaner on my phone as I do weekly and the thought momentarily crossed my mind that I shouldn't trust CCleaner on my phone I limit my use of apps as much as I can but my next immediate thought was, "Nah, this is Piriform we're talking about, they're one of the few free software developers I can probably trust to never inject malware into their products.
Bundled installers are the worst thing about the old way windows software was distributed. I think it is just about time for all apps to be distributed only by APPX package; now that the Project Centennial bridge has been available for several Windows builds, and what with the Anniversary Update making sideloading on by default, and the UX Upgrades for sideloading in the AU and Creators Update and now with all of that several months to a year old.
Office itself is in Preview on the Windows Store, and when that comes out of Preview, other developers are especially going to be on notice to get applications into APPX packages, if not the Store, because for most applications if Office can do it, so can you.
What's the easiest way to find out whether a computer is infected? What can be done on machines that have a new install of CCleaner - Is there a patch available? Updating with their release blogpost instead, as it's clearer: No other Piriform or CCleaner products were affected.
We encourage all users of the bit version of CCleaner v5. We apologize and are taking extra measures to ensure this does not happen again. Users of CCleaner Cloud version 1. In other words, to the best of our knowledge, we were able to disarm the threat before it was able to do any harm.
So if you have a Windows copy, look for a patch I guess. Seems like it's not just fixed, but the rogue server taken down. They also have a portable version, which is what I always use, so you don't have the installer issue of course the main exe could be compromised, but that's not the case here.
I am happy now that I haven't updated my installation of ccleaner for over a year and so I am safe. I never needed this kind of software while running Windows XP.
Quit installing more than you need. I still run it occasionally on my windows 10 laptop which has a small ssd for the main drive. Me too, good that their update isn't convenient.. Gotta check other computers though, and smartphones.
Does anyone know whether the macOS Version was infected? Others have stated only bit Windows installer was comprimised. So, no, macOS version was not infected. Even though the original article is named that way, I propose changing the thread title to the proper, well-known application name, CCleaner.
Also "A vast" - a play on Avast. Installer neither on your system. They do more harm than good. Two seconds to type four words into the search bar. That doesn't prove the parents contention which was "they do more harm than good".
They presumably have something they've based that opinion on other than the existence of problems with a particular app - if you don't have anything substantive to add then please keep your "lm[f]gtfy, lolz" type comments to yourself, thanks.
The opinion is based on the broken computers and applications that happen after running CCleaner. That software basically go through your computer and delete a ton of things that it considers useless. Have you ever seen the defaults settings?
For instance, it used to delete the history, cache and settings from all major browsers. Uninstalling CCleaner and formatting now.
Coments:
05.03.2018 Maukus :
Oct 18, · LAW ENFORCEMENT & CCLEANER significance for the police forensics to get your hard drive under a enough data to use in court and win. Apr 08, · Ive been using the wiping free space tool in CCleaner I have some sensitive How good is CCleaner at Drive Wiping? the procedures used by police. For an unspecified length of time, legitimate CCleaner downloads appear to have been distributing malware alongside the intended software, potentially infecting.